<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neal Reviews &#124; Movies &#187; Uncategorized</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reviews.nealtucker.org/category/uncategorized/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 19:28:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Toy Story 3</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2010/11/21/toy-story-3/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2010/11/21/toy-story-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 19:59:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[2010]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[4/4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[animated]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[film]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A solid children&#8217;s film isn&#8217;t really a children&#8217;s film at all. We all know that. But it takes a group of people working together toward that aim like Pixar to make this deceptively complex truth a reality. Time and time and time again, they succeed. And Toy Story 3 is yet another in a long line of &#8220;children&#8217;s films&#8221; that are anything but. They are films directed at the child in each of us, and films to which we can all relate, regardless of childhood or background. And, yet again, it&#8217;s hard to find one better than this one. The saga of Woody, Buzz, Slinky, Mr. &#38; Mrs. Potato Head, and the whole gang goes back more than a dozen years (it all began in &#8217;95). Since then, they (and their imaginative and fearless leader, Andy, who is about to head to college) have given us a riot of laughs and tears and everything in between. Here, our hapless group of toys finds themselves stuck in a daycare center, among other foreign lands, constantly within inches of mutilation or simply being covered in fluorescent green paint. They come to find that the children that play with them on an hourly basis are the least of their worries, as Lotso the Bear, Ken (of Barbie fame), and a host of other malevolent toys have it out for their imminent demise. Working together, they must find a way out of the daycare and back to Andy, back to the life they once knew, however fragile it might be. The voice acting is as good as we remember. Tom Hanks and Tim Allen lead the troupe, of course, playing Woody and Buzz Lightyear respectively, and Ned Beatty joins them as the maleficent teddy bear. The animation design team is equally wonderful, bringing to life the loveable band of plastic misfits. And who better to direct it than Lee Unkrich, who directed the second film in this series (the other obvious choice is John Lasseter, who directed the original film)? The whole team works so well together, so seamlessly, that the end result is nothing other than what it must be: an incredible film on all levels. Near the roll of the credits (and the floodgates), as this epic coming-of-age tale comes to a close, we reflect on our childhood, on the life we are living, the friends we have made (both physical and imaginary), and, if we have them, children of our own, who are learning to understand the world around them, weaving their very own sigils in the air, and giving to their stories a local habitation and a name, as the creators of this film have done beautifully over and over again. Toy Story 3 is a must see. It is this year&#8217;s Up, captivating people of all ages, touching us, coaxing us into a vulnerability in ways that much passing as film these days doesn&#8217;t even dream of. We were all children once, and inside each of us a child continues to live,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter" title="Toy Story 3" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_7lsIusfBy1c/TCEuqs1guUI/AAAAAAAAANs/x6wu5F7bBds/s1600/toy-story-3.png" alt="" width="353" height="546" /></p>
<p>A solid children&#8217;s film isn&#8217;t really a children&#8217;s film at all. We all know that. But it takes a group of people working together toward that aim like Pixar to make this deceptively complex truth a reality. Time and time and time again, they succeed. And <em>Toy Story 3</em> is yet another in a long line of &#8220;children&#8217;s films&#8221; that are anything but. They are films directed at the child in each of us, and films to which we can all relate, regardless of childhood or background. And, yet again, it&#8217;s hard to find one better than this one.</p>
<p>The saga of Woody, Buzz, Slinky, Mr. &amp; Mrs. Potato Head, and the whole gang goes back more than a dozen years (it all began in &#8217;95). Since then, they (and their imaginative and fearless leader, Andy, who is about to head to college) have given us a riot of laughs and tears and everything in between. Here, our hapless group of toys finds themselves stuck in a daycare center, among other foreign lands, constantly within inches of mutilation or simply being covered in fluorescent green paint.</p>
<p>They come to find that the children that play with them on an hourly basis are the least of their worries, as Lotso the Bear, Ken (of Barbie fame), and a host of other malevolent toys have it out for their imminent demise. Working together, they must find a way out of the daycare and back to Andy, back to the life they once knew, however fragile it might be.</p>
<p>The voice acting is as good as we remember. Tom Hanks and Tim Allen lead the troupe, of course, playing Woody and Buzz Lightyear respectively, and Ned Beatty joins them as the maleficent teddy bear. The animation design team is equally wonderful, bringing to life the loveable band of plastic misfits. And who better to direct it than Lee Unkrich, who directed the second film in this series (the other obvious choice is John Lasseter, who directed the original film)? The whole team works so well together, so seamlessly, that the end result is nothing other than what it must be: an incredible film on all levels.</p>
<p>Near the roll of the credits (and the floodgates), as this epic coming-of-age tale comes to a close, we reflect on our childhood, on the life we are living, the friends we have made (both physical and imaginary), and, if we have them, children of our own, who are learning to understand the world around them, weaving their very own sigils in the air, and giving to their stories a local habitation and a name, as the creators of this film have done beautifully over and over again.</p>
<p><em>Toy Story 3</em> is a must see. It is this year&#8217;s <em>Up</em>, captivating people of all ages, touching us, coaxing us into a vulnerability in ways that much passing as film these days doesn&#8217;t even dream of. We were all children once, and inside each of us a child continues to live, continues to play and to create immense worlds of adventure out of wooden blocks and tuberous dolls, out of cotton cowboys and space invaders, out of magic and the stuff of the imagination. If you see an animated film this year, please make it this one. You&#8217;ll thank yourself (and so will your kids).</p>
<p>Rating: 4/4 Stars</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2010/11/21/toy-story-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oscar Response 2009</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/23/oscar-response-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/23/oscar-response-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[new movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I will only tackle the big 6 here (I might tackle more on nealtucker.org): AWARD   &#8211;   WINNER    -   MY PICK Best Picture &#8211; Hypedog Millionaire &#8211; Anything But (I really wanted Ben Button.) Best Director &#8211; Hypedog Millionaire - Anything But (Ben Button or Milk would have appeased me.) Best Actor &#8211; Penn &#8211; Penn Best Actress &#8211; Winslet &#8211; Winslet Supp. Actor &#8211; Ledger &#8211; Ledger Supp. Actress &#8211; Cruz &#8211; Henson (Robbed. Cruz should be arrested for&#8230;for that.)   Here&#8217;s a link to all the winners.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will only tackle the big 6 here (I might tackle more on nealtucker.org):</p>
<p>AWARD   &#8211;   WINNER    -   MY PICK</p>
<p>Best Picture &#8211; Hypedog Millionaire &#8211; Anything But (I really wanted Ben Button.)</p>
<p>Best Director &#8211; Hypedog Millionaire - Anything But (Ben Button or Milk would have appeased me.)</p>
<p>Best Actor &#8211; Penn &#8211; Penn</p>
<p>Best Actress &#8211; Winslet &#8211; Winslet</p>
<p>Supp. Actor &#8211; Ledger &#8211; Ledger</p>
<p>Supp. Actress &#8211; Cruz &#8211; Henson (Robbed. Cruz should be arrested for&#8230;for that.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://oscar.com/oscarnight/winners/">Here&#8217;s a link to all the winners.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/23/oscar-response-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Animated Short Films (nominated for Oscar)</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/13/oscar-animated-short-films/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/13/oscar-animated-short-films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[new movie review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just watched the Animated Short Films nominated for this year&#8217;s Oscars.  Well, four out of the five.  I can&#8217;t find the 5th one.  Google doesn&#8217;t have it anywhere. Watch the other four, though, right here, and then you can read my review, or vice versa, whatever you want to do.  Or neither. Here&#8217;s the link to go watch 4/5:  http://cinemascopian.com/2009/02/05/watch-the-oscar-nominated-animated-shorts/ When I find the 5th, I&#8217;ll update this post. Lavatory/Lovestory (Russia): It&#8217;s about a woman who runs a Russian restroom.  She seeks love and romance.  In what seems a futile search for the man who keeps putting flowers in her coin jar, she nearly loses her mind.  Well, kind of.  I won&#8217;t spoil the end for you.  It&#8217;s very simply animated, which means it won&#8217;t win, but it&#8217;s a good story, and albeit simple, has a neat way of using the almost childlike animation to tell its story. Oktapodi (France): Extremely short.  Less than three minutes, if I remember correctly.  Definitely less than five.  Two octopi (or are they squid?) are separated, and the orange one goes after the pink one, to save it from imminent death.  What ensues is essentially a chase scene, albeit a hilarious one.  It&#8217;s a fun story, surprising, and absolutely hysterically funny. Presto (US): If you saw Wall-E, you&#8217;ve seen this one.  If you haven&#8217;t, then here&#8217;s what it&#8217;s about: a rabbit wants a carrot, which its magician owner won&#8217;t give to it.  It retaliates by making his show a miserable and painful failure.  The audience eats it up, though, and in the end, so does the rabbit.  Because it&#8217;s Pixar, it has fantastic animation, what we&#8217;ve come to expect from them.  It might win just for that.  The story is very enjoyable and fantastical in a Looney Tunes kind of way.  It&#8217;s just a lot of fun to watch.  I think it&#8217;s my pick. This Way Up (UK): Two men need to transport a dead body in its casket across the world (it seems) to its final resting place.  Trouble ensues when their car is destroyed.  They must literally carry it to the grave.  When they finally arive, they find they are not only carrying her body to the grave, but her soul to the afterlife.  It&#8217;s a neat and intriguing story that has a chance to win because of great animation, an intersting story, and fun twists.  I liked it a lot. La Maison de Petit Cubes (Japan): I can&#8217;t find it.  When I do, I&#8217;ll let you know.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.oscar.com"><img class="size-medium wp-image-50  aligncenter" title="Short Film (Animated)" src="http://reviews.nealtucker.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/screenhunter_01-feb-13-0153-300x197.gif" alt="Short Film (Animated)" width="300" height="197" /></a></p>
<p>I just watched the Animated Short Films nominated for this year&#8217;s Oscars.  Well, four out of the five.  I can&#8217;t find the 5th one.  Google doesn&#8217;t have it anywhere.</p>
<p>Watch the other four, though, right here, and then you can read my review, or vice versa, whatever you want to do.  Or neither.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link to go watch 4/5:  <a href="http://cinemascopian.com/2009/02/05/watch-the-oscar-nominated-animated-shorts/">http://cinemascopian.com/2009/02/05/watch-the-oscar-nominated-animated-shorts/</a></p>
<p>When I find the 5th, I&#8217;ll update this post.</p>
<p><em><strong>Lavatory/Lovestory</strong><span style="font-style: normal;"> (Russia)</span></em>: It&#8217;s about a woman who runs a Russian restroom.  She seeks love and romance.  In what seems a futile search for the man who keeps putting flowers in her coin jar, she nearly loses her mind.  Well, kind of.  I won&#8217;t spoil the end for you.  It&#8217;s very simply animated, which means it won&#8217;t win, but it&#8217;s a good story, and albeit simple, has a neat way of using the almost childlike animation to tell its story.</p>
<p><strong><em>Oktapodi</em><span style="font-weight: normal;"> (France)</span></strong>: Extremely short.  Less than three minutes, if I remember correctly.  Definitely less than five.  Two octopi (or are they squid?) are separated, and the orange one goes after the pink one, to save it from imminent death.  What ensues is essentially a chase scene, albeit a hilarious one.  It&#8217;s a fun story, surprising, and absolutely hysterically funny.</p>
<p><strong><em>Presto </em><span style="font-weight: normal;">(US)</span></strong>: If you saw <em>Wall-E</em>, you&#8217;ve seen this one.  If you haven&#8217;t, then here&#8217;s what it&#8217;s about: a rabbit wants a carrot, which its magician owner won&#8217;t give to it.  It retaliates by making his show a miserable and painful failure.  The audience eats it up, though, and in the end, so does the rabbit.  Because it&#8217;s Pixar, it has fantastic animation, what we&#8217;ve come to expect from them.  It might win just for that.  The story is very enjoyable and fantastical in a Looney Tunes kind of way.  It&#8217;s just a lot of fun to watch.  I think it&#8217;s my pick.</p>
<p><strong><em>This Way Up</em><span style="font-weight: normal;"> (UK)</span></strong>: Two men need to transport a dead body in its casket across the world (it seems) to its final resting place.  Trouble ensues when their car is destroyed.  They must literally carry it to the grave.  When they finally arive, they find they are not only carrying her body to the grave, but her soul to the afterlife.  It&#8217;s a neat and intriguing story that has a chance to win because of great animation, an intersting story, and fun twists.  I liked it a lot.</p>
<p><strong><em>La Maison de Petit Cubes </em><span style="font-weight: normal;">(Japan)</span></strong>: I can&#8217;t find it.  When I do, I&#8217;ll let you know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2009/02/13/oscar-animated-short-films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reviews</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/10/18/reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/10/18/reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 06:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=5</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think I would like to make this my review site. It will be a site to review anything. I don&#8217;t want to limit it to only books, or just movies, or what have you&#8230;. Instead, it might be anything. I might watch a movie, and then review it; a book, likewise; a website, and give some screenshots of what worked and what didn&#8217;t; new technology I get my hands on (unlikely, I might add), similarly; and so on and so forth until the end of time. So get pumped. Get excited. GET STOKED. CUZ REVIEWS IS COMIN. ! Thanks for listening,Neal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I would like to make this my review site.  It will be a site to review anything.  I don&#8217;t want to limit it to only books, or just movies, or what have you&#8230;.  Instead, it might be anything.  I might watch a movie, and then review it; a book, likewise; a website, and give some screenshots of what worked and what didn&#8217;t; new technology I get my hands on (unlikely, I might add), similarly; and so on and so forth until the end of time.  So get pumped.  Get excited.  GET STOKED.  CUZ REVIEWS IS COMIN.  !</p>
<p>Thanks for listening,<br />Neal</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/10/18/reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What kind of blog?</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/12/what-kind-of-blog/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/12/what-kind-of-blog/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What kind of blog do I want this to be?  I said in my last (first) post that I would be switching over from Vox to here, Blogger, and the main reason was because this is a Google company, which is where I want to have all my eggs.  In one Gbasket.  But the reason is simple: it&#8217;s easier to use one website to do everything I need on a daily or weekly basis, whatever the case may be.  I check my Gmail and Gcalendar each day.  I&#8217;d be lost without it.  Class, rehearsal, homework, even NFL/College football schedules.  It&#8217;s great. But again: what kind of blog do I want this to be?  Right now: I don&#8217;t know.  I am thinking that perhaps this would be a nice different blog from my Vox blog.  I could use that one for what I have been using it for, mostly recently: to update everyone on what I&#8217;m up to.  However, I could use this one for that, too.  I could also use both, which I mentioned in my last (first) post, as well.  I just don&#8217;t know yet. I&#8217;ve been toying with the notion of a Tech Blog.  But I&#8217;m not &#8220;in&#8221; enough to do that.  I like technology.  But I&#8217;m not a Tech Junkie.  And the idea of having a philosophical or news blog would be too much time for me to devote to it, I&#8217;m afraid. So, I guess my conclusion thus far is this: I&#8217;m going to keep posting and just play it by ear, see what happens, and other sensory metaphors.  Until then, or until next time, or until a new and exciting bowel movement, I will be here.  Thinking.  About emperor penguins. Thanks for listening, Neal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What kind of blog do I want this to be?  I said in my last (first) post that I would be switching over from Vox to here, Blogger, and the main reason was because this is a Google company, which is where I want to have all my eggs.  In one Gbasket.  But the reason is simple: it&#8217;s easier to use one website to do everything I need on a daily or weekly basis, whatever the case may be.  I check my Gmail and Gcalendar each day.  I&#8217;d be lost without it.  Class, rehearsal, homework, even NFL/College football schedules.  It&#8217;s great.
<div></div>
<div>But again: what kind of blog do I want this to be?  Right now: I don&#8217;t know.  I am thinking that perhaps this would be a nice <span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-style: italic;">different</span> blog from my Vox blog.  I could use that one for what I have been using it for, mostly recently: to update everyone on what I&#8217;m up to.  However, I could use this one for that, too.  I could also use both, which I mentioned in my last (first) post, as well.  I just don&#8217;t know yet.</div>
<div></div>
<div>I&#8217;ve been toying with the notion of a Tech Blog.  But I&#8217;m not &#8220;in&#8221; enough to do that.  I like technology.  But I&#8217;m not a Tech Junkie.  And the idea of having a philosophical or news blog would be too much time for me to devote to it, I&#8217;m afraid.</div>
<div></div>
<div>So, I guess my conclusion thus far is this: I&#8217;m going to keep posting and just play it by ear, see what happens, and other sensory metaphors.  Until then, or until next time, or until a new and exciting bowel movement, I will be here.  Thinking.  About emperor penguins.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Thanks for listening,</div>
<div>Neal</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/12/what-kind-of-blog/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Making the Move</title>
		<link>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/07/making-the-move/</link>
		<comments>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/07/making-the-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 04:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Neal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reviews.nealtucker.org/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is my first post on Blogger with this blog.  I just wanted to get that out there. Consolidation.  I want to be able to use Google for all my major web/computer needs.  Honestly, Google makes this uber-easy.  So, I am not expecting the move to be difficult.  After all, easy and difficult are&#8230;well&#8230;antipodal.  I have been blogging at nealtucker.vox.com, and I will probably continue to post there as well.  I really like their setup, the look of my blog there, and the intuitive publishing and formatting settings.  But, I also like having everything I need on Google.  I log in once, and there everything is.  Right at my fingertips.  I am on flickr, which is a Yahoo!-owned company, but Picasa doesn&#8217;t really compare.  Not in my opinion.  And there is one major reason: limitations, limitations, and price.  That sounds like three reasons.  Well, it sounds like two reasons.  But they are so interrelated that it&#8217;s really one reason.  Picasa charges you for more space, but doesn&#8217;t give you unlimited space.  Flickr, for which I pay to be a &#8220;Pro&#8221; user/memeber, gives me unlimited bandwidth and online real estate space.  I love that.  Personally, I love Google, but until Picasa allows you to work like Flickr does, my pictures will be one of the only things I keep off it (it = Google). To get back to why I am posting here.  I want to move my stuff to Google&#8217;s online product suite.  There are several things I want from Google that they don&#8217;t offer yet. 1) A cell phone 2) An OS 3) Unlimited Picasa 4) Facebook integration 5)A Skype-like application Once they get those, I&#8217;m set.  Google will be able to take care of my tech/communication needs, and I will be able to sign in to one website and do everything I need to do: socialize, email, calendar, news, documents, pictures, etc.  Keep your eyes open.  It could happen.  Sooner than we think. From Chicago, Neal]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This is my first post on Blogger with this blog.  I just wanted to get that out there.</div>
<div></div>
<div>Consolidation.  I want to be able to use Google for all my major web/computer needs.  Honestly, Google makes this uber-easy.  So, I am not expecting the move to be difficult.  After all, easy and difficult are&#8230;well&#8230;antipodal.  I have been blogging at nealtucker.vox.com, and I will probably continue to post there as well.  I really like their setup, the look of my blog there, and the intuitive publishing and formatting settings.  But, I also like having everything I need on Google.  I log in once, and there everything is.  Right at my fingertips.  I am on flickr, which is a Yahoo!-owned company, but Picasa doesn&#8217;t really compare.  Not in my opinion.  And there is one major reason: limitations, limitations, and price.  That sounds like three reasons.  Well, it sounds like two reasons.  But they are so interrelated that it&#8217;s really one reason.  Picasa charges you for more space, but doesn&#8217;t give you unlimited space.  Flickr, for which I pay to be a &#8220;Pro&#8221; user/memeber, gives me unlimited bandwidth and online real estate space.  I love that.  Personally, I love Google, but until Picasa allows you to work like Flickr does, my pictures will be one of the only things I keep off it (it = Google).</div>
<div></div>
<div>To get back to why I am posting here.  I want to move my stuff to Google&#8217;s online product suite.  There are several things I want from Google that they don&#8217;t offer yet.</div>
<div>1) A cell phone</div>
<div>2) An OS</div>
<div>3) Unlimited Picasa</div>
<div>4) Facebook integration</div>
<div>5)A Skype-like application</div>
<div></div>
<div>Once they get those, I&#8217;m set.  Google will be able to take care of my tech/communication needs, and I will be able to sign in to one website and do everything I need to do: socialize, email, calendar, news, documents, pictures, etc.  Keep your eyes open.  It could happen.  Sooner than we think.</div>
<div></div>
<div>From Chicago,</div>
<div>Neal</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://reviews.nealtucker.org/2008/09/07/making-the-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

